Valley's Bennison calls for a united industry effort over ban
EMBATTLED Valley, whose very existence is threatened by the prospect of a ban on greyhound racing in Wales, has called for a concerted industry effort to battle against the Welsh government's plan which management say has left the track as a 'political football'.
Suggestions that the shock announcement owed much to the political necessity to get the Labour minority administration's Budget passed - Welsh Lib Dem leader and sole MS [member of the Senedd] Jane Dodds, an avowed anti-greyhound racing campaigner, effectively held the casting vote - have only stiffened the resolve of those set to be impacted.
Track operator and GBGB board member, Katie Bennison, who just last weekend stressed the community asset nature of the Ystrad Mynach venue, said: "All at Valley Greyhounds were shocked and saddened by the sudden announcement from the Deputy First Minister [Huw Irranca-Davies] on Tuesday.
"Our sport is a community and way of life, not a political football. To see the Welsh Government confirming their decision was about political strategy, over care for local people, only adds to our intense disappointment in the process so far.
"We have invested millions of pounds purchasing and investing in improvements at the stadium.
"The welfare standards at the stadium have never been higher and continue to be our primary concern above all else.
"Operating as a regulated GBGB licensed track also ensures and demands the highest standard of welfare for our greyhounds.
"Despite regular invitations, the Deputy First Minister has failed to engage with the regulator or visit the track.
"We feel the statement regarding banning greyhound racing has been an emotive response, not one based on the evidence produced as part of the Welsh Government’s own consultation process. Our staff, trainers, owners and local community have not been taken into consideration.
"We hope the industry and all its key stakeholders will all come together to explore every avenue possible to prevent a ban."
It is understood that legal means to challenge the decision are set to be explored.